A
text is anything that conveys
meaning. It can be print, visual or sound. Its meaning can be superficial or
more significant.
And
a text can mean different things to different people - readers
(responders) - for a range of reasons:
-
personal
-
social
-
historical
-
cultural and
-
workplace.
These reasons shape the way that we respond to a text.
Therefore the composer of a text and the reader of a text will not bring the
same background to the reading of the text.
To
give an extreme example:These reasons can explain the difference between you
as a reader responding to King Lear and Shakespeare as the composer
of the text, making the decisions he did in creating King Lear.
|
Shakespeare |
King Lear
& |
You - Year 12
HSC English student |
|
personal:
1564 - 1616; male |
personal:
youngest of 4;boy's school;1989 - |
|
social:
actors' company; wife and children |
social:
peers; neighbouring girl's school;
tennis |
|
historical:
Tudor kings and queen; autocracy |
historical:
Cronulla riots; reclaiming the Ashes |
|
cultural:
Renaissance; exploration |
cultural:
iPod; Ian Thorpe; Missy Higgins |
|
workplace:
dramatist; actor; manager |
workplace:
student; McDonald's |
-
Literary
approaches to texts -
literary theory or critical readings - reflect the response to texts by
people with shared beliefs; for example, social, historical, cultural
etc.
Critical readings include:
You are not expected to
know all readings and how they apply to your text. It is sufficient to
select two to be familiar with and to focus on one in particular.
You
can link readings and production in this course. Productions are often
influenced by critical readings. In any case, a production is, in effect, a
'reading'; it is simply not printed as a book or article.
King Lear,
the filmed version directed by Peter Brook, was supported by Jan
Kott's reading in his book, Shakespeare Our Contemporary.
A reading that was accessible to students
because of the nature of changes it made to the original was Nahum Tate's
version of King Lear. Students found it easier to discuss the
benefits of a happier ending given the context of Tate's version. They were
also better prepared, having read it, to examine Shakespeare's intentions in
his text. They were also able to evaluate Shakespeare's use of language
against Tate's language.
Akira Kurasawa's
Ran, also makes significant changes to King Lear. The play is
transported to medieval Japan with the necessary cultural changes. The roles
of Goneril, Regan and Cordelia also become male. The striking differences
made discussion of issues of production accessible to students and the
changed context made the idea of 'reading' clear.